Lenovo 20W6009CMX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20W6009CMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20W6009CMX
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 16:06
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 34.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
57% 111 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 416
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 22CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 27.1
17% 22 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 20.9
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 1010 1080 1183 1193 1209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 852
Write 633
Mixed 700
SusWrite 1091
185% 819 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 41.1
124% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 210
153% 200 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 149%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 Ramaxel RMSA3320ME88HBF-3200 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20W6009CMX Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20W6009CMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback