IT P7xxTM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIT P7xxTM1  (all builds)
MotherboardIT P7xxTM1
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 09:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 937
90% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,503
93% 1,503 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 168
Parallax 158
122% 158 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 139
Splatting 125
119% 149 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 446 101 135 7 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 493
Write 351
Mixed 398
SusWrite 138
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 24.1
103% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 1.2
73% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
712GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 477 469 478 475 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 474
Mixed 389
SusWrite 472
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 39.2
129% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7xxTM1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

System: IT P7xxTM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback