MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220811
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '23 at 06:25
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$175 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 32.2 2-Core 59 21% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 220 21% 172 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 86% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.56 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 130 Parallax 125 100% 126 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 122 Splatting 112 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 348 550 450 556 578 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 492 Write 694 Mixed 241 SusWrite 482 108% 478 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 4.7 43% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 373 268% 344 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 488%
WD WD62PURZ-85AJFY0 6TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 69 73 74 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 51.2 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 67.3 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 117%
Amd-raid ST14000NM001G-2K 14TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 51GB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 77 84 88 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 75.6 Write 103 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 77.9 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.7 599% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 138%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB 2,378 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 77GB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 29 29 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 203 Write 27 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 28.3 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 92%
Toshiba MDA3ACA400R 4TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 41GB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 73 73 69 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 76.8 Write 135 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 71.3 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 88%
Intenso SCSI 1TB 453 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 37GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 25 25 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 32.9 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 24.2 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 77%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 77GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 60 58 64 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	36% Below average	Read 126 Write 75.9 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 55.3 99% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 60%
WDC WD14 0EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 10TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 65 71 70 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28% Poor	Read 71 Write 116 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 63.1 120% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.2 86% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 91%
WDC WD14 0EDGZ-11B1PA0 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 12TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 65 61 70 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29% Poor	Read 61.9 Write 64 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 63.4 84% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 110% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL18-22-22 D4-3600 2x8GB 2,960 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 22.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 681 6% 681 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,734x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,603x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,386x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,080x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	747x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	522x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	618x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	517x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	264x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	344x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	179x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,412

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16