MSI MS-14C6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14Evo A12M
MotherboardMSI MS-14C6  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1280P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 38
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 80.9
43% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 710
59% 510 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1326) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1109
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 15.3
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 13
Splatting 8.6
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 92 142 179 166 139 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 1,058
Write 986
Mixed 970
SusWrite 150
177% 791 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 10.4
34% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 14.7
12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNFAMMLXR-NEE 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 31.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14C6 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback