MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210928
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,017
96% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 31.7
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 23.7
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 382
Mixed 314
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 24.5
129% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 33.6
65% 128 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
MB1000EBZQB 1TB
482GB free
Firmware: HPG1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16,671
Mixed 91.7
5,992% 8,381 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
SteelRam A01 496GB
422GB free, PID 0a01
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 215
Write 140
Mixed 192
226% 183 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
183% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback