Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 304
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 940
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Zotac(19DA B612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 268
Parallax 332
241% 298 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 236
Splatting 182
202% 257 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 202%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 370 378 388 388 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,572
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 409
291% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 34.8
150% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 763
615% 877 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 192%
Great: 323%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
162GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 419 394 224 271 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 179
Write 94.3
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 349
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 19.4
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 67
47% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF432C16BB/8-SP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 32.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 32.1
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback