Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 04:07
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 163
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 988
97% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Zotac(19DA B612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2460 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 304
2% 107 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 237
Splatting 182
202% 258 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 386 379 257 147 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 1853
Mixed 1,551
SusWrite 308
332% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 42.4
174% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 768
614% 869 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 203%
Great: 323%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
162GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 458 104 92 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 428
Write 128
Mixed 325
SusWrite 204
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 35.8
138% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 201
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF432C16BB/8-SP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 32.3
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 32.2
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback