LG 14TD990-G.AX30K

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	LG 14TD990-G.AX30K (all builds)
Motherboard	LG 14T990
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190306
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '23 at 11:03
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 101 42% 69.2 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 123 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1854 0333) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 6.6 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 6.1 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1009 128GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6104009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 51 72 50 48 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45% Average	Read 391 Write 328 Mixed 238 SusWrite 67.7 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 18.2 61% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 109 90% 131 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 84%
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1009 128GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 56GB free Firmware: X6104009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 108 109 109 108 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 358 Write 145 Mixed 222 SusWrite 114 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 18 60% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 127 102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 84%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 5GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 54.9 Write 11.9 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 10.7 23% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 56% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 16%
SanDisk Cruzer Snap 16GB 526 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 12GB free, PID 55a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.9 7 6.3 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 53.5 Write 18 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 7.3 25% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 14TD990-G.AX30K Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: LG 14TD990-G.AX30K

CPU
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	1x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1009 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 84 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GBSamsungBench 73%, 79 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16