Lenovo 10GRA01CPC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Lenovo 10GRA01CPC (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SKYBAY
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '23 at 08:35
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 3.48 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 162 38% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 325 42% 315 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 30D9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 6 4% 5.07 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 8.8 6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870EVO 500G 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 377GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8301c70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 252 29 27 26 25 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 245 Write 230 Mixed 220 SusWrite 106 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 17.5 62% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 112 96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 67%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 51GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 67 67 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 80.5 Write 90.1 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 67.4 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 114GB free Firmware: JPFOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 62 61 62 62 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 75.1 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 62 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 3.1 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 469 8% 469 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 10GRA01CPC Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10GRA01CPC

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	32x
Core i5-6400Intel $67Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	18x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x
870EVO 500G 500GBSamsungBench 59%, 11 samples	3x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	23x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	4x
Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $33Bench 74%, 14,163 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16