Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QB_M6500QB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QB_M6500QB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500QB
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 06:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 110
44% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 371
35% 290 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11D3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 27.7
10% 19.6 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 20.3
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1135 1143 1090 817 808 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,116
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 1,030
253% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 42.6
138% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 481
356% 473 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 177%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QB_M6500QB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QB_M6500QB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback