| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP HPE-372f (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MSI 2A9C |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100519 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 05 '23 at 01:13 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.3%
Above average
|
60% 98 Pts
|
33% 267 Pts
|
20% 331 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
46% 86.3 fps
|
51% 67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3 240GB SSD 240GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 207 97 48 57 44 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
43% 193 MB/s
|
66% 25.4 MB/s
|
64% 119 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
89GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 228 222 230 226 228 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
52% 228 MB/s
|
90% 31.7 MB/s
|
140% 185 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 75TT13NU2R8-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
23.8%
Poor
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
49% 81 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical HPE-372f Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP HPE-372f
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $320 |