ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 181 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 685 59% 507 Pts	64-Core 1,176 73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 124 Parallax 132 115% 132 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 107 Splatting 91.7 91% 115 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB 5,933 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0806A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 991 226 638 175 227 229 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,853 Write 1,533 Mixed 1,141 SusWrite 414 275% 1,235 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 24.5 166% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 773 DQ Write 633 DQ Mixed 591 473% 666 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 264%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown atermiter atermiter 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 48.5 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 36.3 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback