Dell XPS 15 9570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 15 9570  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0HWTMH
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 86
43% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 39.9
8-Core 48.8
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
Dell(1028 087C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 23.8
17% 24.3 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 19.1
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 820 825 822 836 823 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 724
Write 629
Mixed 535
SusWrite 788
151% 669 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 28.2
92% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 179
126% 160 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 113%
Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471A2K43DB1-CTD 80CE000080CE M471A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 16.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.7
1% 0.47 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 15 9570 Builds (Compare 4,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback