MSI MS-17G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS75 Stealth 8SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17G1  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 14:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 716
68% 563 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 1277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.6% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 98.4
Parallax 97.9
75% 96.3 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 86.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 94%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1277) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn NX2200 1TB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 976 980 927 890 915 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 882
Write 2,056
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 1,002
291% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 46.2
151% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 827
615% 820 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 180%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 23.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17G1 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback