Lenovo 10JRS0640N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10JRS0640N  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30D2
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 14:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 110
38% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 113
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 217 297 242 17 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 158
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 5.2
24% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 94.4
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 24.2
26% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 102%
RTFMB032RFM1EWLX 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: R2004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 35 34 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 251
Write 36.3
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 34.5
20% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 9.2
37% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 67.8
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 40.2
33% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 319
12% 319 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10JRS0640N Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10JRS0640N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback