Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTarox Entry Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-B1
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 12:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 178
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 434
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.8
34% 40.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 162 162 179 171 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 188
Write 139
Mixed 146
SusWrite 166
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 8.6
38% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 132
111% 161 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 37%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
367GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 75
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 97.3
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Entry Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback