Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemTarox Entry Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-B1
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 16:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 190
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 545
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.6
34% 40.4 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 308 310 313 309 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 432
Write 302
Mixed 296
SusWrite 307
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 25.9
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 236
206% 307 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Entry Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback