Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '23 at 09:35
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 142 59% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 221 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU) 18,674 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 7 4% 6.43 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 10.2 6% 7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 401 398 403 6.6 6.3 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38% Below average	Read 192 Write 98.4 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 260 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 10.9 46% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 14.2 11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 231GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 96 97 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 104 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 96.3 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 76GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 30 Mixed 20 SusWrite 30.9 41% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-426.A00G 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,313x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,011x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	958x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	745x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	719x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	295x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16