Intel GrossePoint Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel GrossePoint
MotherboardIntel GrossePoint Server  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 08:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 63
2-Core 125
56% 90 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 205
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 140 137 144 145 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 227
Write 132
Mixed 142
SusWrite 156
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 19.8
79% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 35.1
27% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GrossePoint Server Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel GrossePoint Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback