Asus P5G41T-M LX2/GB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M LX2/GB  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 54.1
32% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 54.2
8-Core 56
7% 55.1 Pts
64-Core 53.5
3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 96 109 122 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.6% Poor
Read 96.3
Write 89.6
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 110
22% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 6.7
36% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 12.1
21% 39 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 92%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 320GB
155GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 23.8
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 24.4
15% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M LX2/GB Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX2/GB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback