Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5500 7,497 User benchmarks, average bench 37% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 54.1 32% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 54.2 8-Core 56 7% 55.1 Pts	64-Core 53.5 3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.6 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB 2,222 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0823A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 96 109 122 108 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 96.3 Write 89.6 Mixed 94.2 SusWrite 110 22% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 6.7 36% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 12.1 21% 39 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 92%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 320GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 155GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 23.8 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 24.4 15% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	19x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	9x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $194Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $229