Lenovo 2992B4G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2992B4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory14 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 08:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 274
33% 254 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 41.8
44% 53 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 45.2
38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 90 96 99 103 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 201
Write 186
Mixed 191
SusWrite 92.4
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 26.1
86% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 30.4
26% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
365GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 96 99 103 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 92.9
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 0C08 Atermiter D3-1600 0100 Atermiter9.A01LF 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2992B4G Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 2992B4G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback