Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171026
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '23 at 17:39
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 646 73% 574 Pts	64-Core 624 39% 624 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 177 Parallax 173 132% 171 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 172 Splatting 115 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 357 240 232 234 245 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 451 Mixed 398 SusWrite 291 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 51.8 163% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 215GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 189GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 9.1 8.7 9.1 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 72.9 Write 57.6 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 9.4 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 215GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 46GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.2 8.6 9.2 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 88.1 Write 80.7 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 9.4 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 215GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 182GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 10 9 9 9 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 81.2 Write 91.1 Mixed 49.9 SusWrite 9.4 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 72GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 9 8.9 9.1 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 73.4 Write 84.2 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 9.3 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 86GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 53GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 10 9.2 9.1 9.1 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 74.9 Write 99.4 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 10.6 44% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 32GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 8.9 8.9 9.2 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 92.5 Write 64.7 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 9.5 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 107% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 27.7 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 25.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $184Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,809x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,060x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	482x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,374x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	817x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	400x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	350x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	297x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	283x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	409x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	332x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	268x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16