HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 732
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8767) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,048
Write 1466
Mixed 1,032
265% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.4
190% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 732
544% 724 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 214%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 139
Mixed 107
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1
17% 6.23 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 39%
Best Buy NS-PC25HDE(-C) 1TB
633GB free
Firmware: 0202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 218
Write 38.3
Mixed 30.9
20% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 16.2
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 69
DQ Write 43.1
DQ Mixed 47
37% 53 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
611GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.1
Write 96.7
Mixed 63.6
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 116
191% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.7
395% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.6
345% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 107%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 156
Mixed 95.8
173% 142 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 1.1
450% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.9
404% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
212GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 24
28% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback