Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 171
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 340
40% 312 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 10.3
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 7.8
8% 10 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 213 189 184 182 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 639
Write 558
Mixed 474
SusWrite 207
105% 470 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 34.3
117% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 418
306% 409 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 9.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 6.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A416EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback