Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '15 at 10:52
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 191
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 494
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 28
20% 30.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 25.5
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 401
Mixed 414
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 39.5
135% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 89.1
97% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 492
Write 274
Mixed 362
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 18.4
76% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 58.6
67% 118 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
598GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 118
Mixed 116
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.38
110% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 1TB
510GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 35.8
Mixed 27.3
42% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.29
64% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LLA Series 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback