Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '17 at 20:35
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 213 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 688 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,084 67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.4% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 113 Parallax 107 86% 108 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 99.6 79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zotac Premium Edition 240GB-$75 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free Firmware: SAFM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3865 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1097 (A8) Unknown 100 100 772688591 (AA) Unknown 100 100 443 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1376325 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 135 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 386344299 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4215	60.8% Good	Read 30.6 Write 504 Mixed 67.4 46% 201 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 12.9 83% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 72.4 66% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 109%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 27641984 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 18640158079551 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3011 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 681 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 25 67 47249031193 (C2) HDA temperature 25 67 47249031193 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 27641984 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 27641984 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 27641984 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 45692 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19009 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19009 (F2) Unknown 0 0 25779	61.4% Good	Read 496 Write 137 Mixed 176 58% 269 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 16.1 88% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 34.6 61% 120 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 73%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 148GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896895161 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1290 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1441 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 385 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1290 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1290 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 158914576410 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77% Very good	Read 128 Write 140 Mixed 130 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.22 95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 107%
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB 1,489 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 42GB free Firmware: 3.ACF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5947 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 87878270 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11459 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2351 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 57 421003289 (C2) HDA temperature 25 43 51539607577 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 53 144956825 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.4% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 35.7 Mixed 35.7 28% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.34 80% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 39%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 13GB free Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 13618 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 14560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3177 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 168 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 116442 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 184684249110 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	44.8% Average	Read 95.9 Write 60 Mixed 59.4 54% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.17 70% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 27.1 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 19.6 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,062

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)