Acer Predator PO3-620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-620
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$233
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 806
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Sapphire(174B A632) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 184
Parallax 167
147% 177 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 137
Splatting 125
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1408 1438 1522 1514 1520 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,471
Write 1470
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 1,471
305% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 64.9
212% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 314
352% 601 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 248%
Great: 301%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 149 151 152 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 144
Write 134
Mixed 26
SusWrite 151
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB
18.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 40.2
54% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 141%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 136
Write 112
Mixed 91
SusWrite 103
145% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 25.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-620 Builds (Compare 2,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $733
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback