Notebook N15_17RF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook N15_17RF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N15_17RF
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 180
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 439
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 0152) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5174
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 37
Parallax 5.6
4% 15.9 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
914GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2704D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 393
Mixed 334
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 11.5
96% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 14
68% 151 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 259%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 250GB
123GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 61
Mixed 66.4
100% 91 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
122% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAC1600S1108 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N15_17RF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Notebook N15_17RF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback