iP3 APB20

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemiP3 APB20  (all builds)
MotherboardiP3 APB20
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 00:05
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 150
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 377
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 15.8
9% 12 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 9.1
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 49 49 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 394
Write 48
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 48.7
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 16.5
63% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 67.7
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 57.9
44% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 290%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 113 114 108 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 161
Write 92.3
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 112
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APB20 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: iP3 APB20

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback