MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 07:32
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
101% 194 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,028
102% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 110
Parallax 134
97% 121 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 116
Splatting 106
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 824 834 840 837 830 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,647
Write 2,530
Mixed 1,824
SusWrite 877
440% 1,970 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.3
295% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 885
657% 882 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 291%
Great: 346%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
30GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 432 410 77 119 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 428
Mixed 428
SusWrite 269
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 48
159% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 182
142% 197 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
42GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 301 211 201 191 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 442
Mixed 444
SusWrite 257
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 47
163% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2K4000C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 24.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 24.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback