Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '23 at 23:35
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$126 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 119 2-Core 230 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 729 70% 575 Pts	64-Core 948 59% 948 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 38.1 Parallax 36.2 29% 36.5 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 25.4 26% 33 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 315GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 845 121 232 244 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,410 Write 1,926 Mixed 1,610 SusWrite 565 311% 1,378 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 59.4 192% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 768 DQ Write 551 DQ Mixed 665 495% 661 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 653GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 468 471 473 413 294 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 473 Mixed 454 SusWrite 431 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 45.7 150% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 336 254% 342 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68JCSN0 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 508GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 40 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 36 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 41.6 53% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68 86,372 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 30.5 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 40.9 SC Mixed 26.3 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	299x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	249x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	204x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	306x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	264x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	221x

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $516

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16