Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 194
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 524
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 40
Parallax 25.3
15% 27.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 14.7
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 205 201 210 215 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 562
Write 575
Mixed 481
SusWrite 217
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 33.9
111% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 505
387% 528 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 131%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
705GB free
Firmware: AX1R2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 101
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 102
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback