Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 15 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium B940 3,831 User benchmarks, average bench 44% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 47 2-Core 69.1 39% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 59 8-Core 82.1 9% 70.6 Pts	64-Core 82.9 5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0609A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 212 78 12 8.7 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 357 Write 315 Mixed 313 SusWrite 113 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 18.1 73% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 57.4 68% 120 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium B940IntelBench 44%, 3,831 samples	11x
Core i7-2760QMIntel $130Bench 60%, 10,423 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	11x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
Force GT 120GBCorsair $155Bench 69%, 13,464 samples	1x