HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 11:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 263
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
PowerColor(148C 2416) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 84.1
33% 62.7 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 27.3
43% 57.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 378 374 409 431 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 378
Write 351
Mixed 314
SusWrite 389
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 214
164% 225 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 029E CML8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback