Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 07:35
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 136
56% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 616
53% 452 Pts
64-Core 2,136
132% 2,136 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,784
Write 1,652
Mixed 1,572
372% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 59.7
196% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 675
496% 654 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
25GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.2
Write 3
Mixed 12.2
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
138% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD 128GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 43
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback