Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 05:37
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 707
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4300
HP(103C 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 21
Parallax 15.2
8% 15.4 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 18
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 415 419 426 431 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 383
Mixed 297
SusWrite 419
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 31
109% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 174
177% 287 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 97%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$7
19GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.7 4.2 0.6 6.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 38.6
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback