Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '17 at 00:13
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 162 71% 117 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 501 50% 409 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.90 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.82% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.79 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 6.83 5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.82% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
H/W RAID10 500GB 162GB free Firmware: 0960 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	45% Average	Read 195 Write 231 Mixed 184 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 14.3 71% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 58.2 DQ Mixed 22 23% 36.9 MB/s

Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14971 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 463 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 51 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 80 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28804889161	79.4% Very good	Read 505 Write 402 Mixed 414 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 18 104% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 18.5 36% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 132%
H/W RAID5 15TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	40.2% Average	Read 94.9 Write 45.5 Mixed 88.2 58% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.05 23% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 61%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 8907768 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4723 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 131799673 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 249111904319 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 42 90917634087 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22143 (C2) HDA temperature 39 58 42949672999 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 10728828321017 (F1) Unknown 100 253 109943976206 (F2) Unknown 100 253 653688559740	92.2% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 162 Mixed 146 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.21 83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 66196544 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4729 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 128134765 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21698 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 656080931 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 29061 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 73014444067 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -49022756700933 (F1) Unknown 100 253 88832421603 (F2) Unknown 100 253 225197790481	83.1% Excellent	Read 156 Write 134 Mixed 127 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.15 74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 165478560 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3035 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 159185597 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22725 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 219046740028 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 41 632184176683 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 29180 (C2) HDA temperature 43 59 68719476779 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -95644626697629 (F1) Unknown 100 253 121851252030 (F2) Unknown 100 253 715652958501	80.2% Excellent	Read 153 Write 127 Mixed 135 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.21 78% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 4x8GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.3% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	391x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	206x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $902

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16