bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 23:01
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X VH
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 257
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 837
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.22621.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 214
Parallax 187
202% 216 fps
MRender 153
Gravity 143
Splatting 128
114% 141 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 70GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,269
Write 1,244
Mixed 1,100
269% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 19.7
64% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 187
169% 266 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 28.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 20.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback