Lenovo 81JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81JS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 22:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 15.7
48% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 270
25% 208 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 39FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6793
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.7
3% 6.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 643 632 619 551 565 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 1,118
Mixed 830
SusWrite 637
213% 951 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 38.8
123% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 154
199% 367 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 147%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81JS Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81JS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback