Acer Aspire A315-59G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-59G  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Callisto_ADU
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220425
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 305
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 921
86% 715 Pts
64-Core 1167
72% 1167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX550
Acer(1025 161D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 43.4
34% 37.3 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 35.2
30% 36.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 1025 213 132 108 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,118
Write 907
Mixed 941
SusWrite 399
188% 841 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 12.1
61% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 672
521% 702 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 119%
Great: 204%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
605GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 113 114 116 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-59G Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-59G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback