Mousecomputer X79A-SD40_8D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMousecomputer X79A-SD40_8D  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer X79A-SD40_8D
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 14:52
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 477
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 15.7
53% 49.4 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 59.1
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSY 512GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 307 307 329 295 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 343
Write 273
Mixed 392
SusWrite 308
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 26.8
85% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 188
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
941GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10003
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,684
Mixed 39.2
975% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-4G68H1P-1 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79A-SD40_8D Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Mousecomputer X79A-SD40_8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback