Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F1400EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F1400EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 11:28
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 49.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 223
72% 136 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 537
59% 464 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18
Parallax 21.5
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 0.1
6% 8.27 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 69 30 247 197 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1642
Write 974
Mixed 822
SusWrite 281
205% 930 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 65.9
218% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 406
357% 523 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 177%
Great: 290%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
705GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 97 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 105
127% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.9
284% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 13.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F1400EA Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F1400EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback