Toshiba Satellite L875

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L875  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 06:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3540M-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 128
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 198
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3.1
6% 4.07 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G1122 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 106 108 108 105 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63% Good
Read 384
Write 369
Mixed 251
SusWrite 110
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 27.8
97% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 225
173% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G HP687515-H66-MCN 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L875 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L875

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback