Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 03:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 575
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 558
35% 558 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 177F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 6.8
5% 22.1 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 61 43 115 76 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 974
Write 908
Mixed 820
SusWrite 170
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 52.3
168% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 401
296% 384 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 119%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Kingston KHX2933C17S4/8G 16GB
3200, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback