Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221023
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '23 at 20:56
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$286 627 User benchmarks, average bench 109% AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 68.3 1-Core 178 2-Core 347 103% 198 Pts	4-Core 635 8-Core 1084 104% 859 Pts	64-Core 1,472 91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 117%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRE512GB-LT 512GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 215 213 210 221 226 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 469 Write 186 Mixed 277 SusWrite 217 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 33.3 122% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 181 164% 248 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB 10,661 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 46.4 MC Write 45.2 MC Mixed 45 130% 45.5 GB/s	SC Read 37 SC Write 44.2 SC Mixed 40.6 116% 40.6 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 171%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 217%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 220%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	9x
SFYRS1000G 1TBKingstonBench 389%, 17,374 samples	8x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	6x

RAM
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	5x
KF560C40-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 146%, 1,375 samples	5x
JHE5600U4008JG 2x8GBUnknownBench 187%, 4 samples	4x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16