Asus GL702VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170629
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 12:35
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 449
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 58.1
33% 46 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 59.7
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 530 523 534 532 524 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,645
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,253
SusWrite 551
280% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 46.9
149% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 420
314% 423 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 165%
Great: 340%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 879 477 342 605 473 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback