Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 592 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 150 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 572 52% 436 Pts	64-Core 1,126 70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Afox 120GB 120GB 440 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8301c18 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 315 Write 360 Mixed 318 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 24.7 82% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 189 143% 189 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 25GB free Firmware: FW200424 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 40 32 30 22 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 445 Write 305 Mixed 265 SusWrite 40.1 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 9.6 51% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 14.1 35% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 204GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 76 77 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 76.4 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	13x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x
RX 580-2048SPAMDBench 41%, 38,816 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	5x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	5x

RAM
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	40x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	9x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $223

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16