Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Memory 18 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 37.3 15% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 48.3 8-Core 60.3 7% 54.3 Pts	64-Core 51.2 3% 51.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 06D8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 2.2 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKT1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 108 131 109 117 186 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 151 Write 96.4 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 135 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 18.6 52% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 112 86% 116 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF564128CJ8NWMNSEG 1x4GB 1,124 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 336 12% 336 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	10x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	11x

SSD
240GB 240GBXraydiskBench 68%, 531 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	1x

RAM
SF564128CJ8NWMNSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 1,124 samples	5x
TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHC 1x4GBTeikonBench 24%, 901 samples	2x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	2x