TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82UF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 01:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 165
55% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 538
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 64.2%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Gigabyte(1458 40CA)
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 283
Parallax 354
238% 309 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 252
Splatting 180
216% 277 fps
Poor: 208% ↑
This bench: 204%
 Great: 256%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.3267
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 19.9
14% 19.5 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.2
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 14.7%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt512g LS KIOXIA 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 381 396 394 397 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,546
Write 1204
Mixed 968
SusWrite 475
234% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 43.5
153% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 317
219% 276 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 149%
 Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 42.9
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 149%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 82UF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82UF

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples190x
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples9x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples192x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1x
SSD
MZAL41T0HBLB-00BL2 1TBSamsungBench 259%, 732 samples148x
MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GBSamsungBench 213%, 2,247 samples24x
LS KIOXIA 1TBKbg50znt1t02Bench 196%, 172 samples12x
RAM
K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 8x4GBSamsungBench 121%, 577 samples133x
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 122%, 3,090 samples63x
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GBHynixBench 118%, 2,587 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback