Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 179
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 201
23% 179 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 5.3 78 8.7 49 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 123
Mixed 235
SusWrite 48.1
106% 135 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 15.6
3,763% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 29.4
573% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
772GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 142 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 143
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback